Musicians Collaboration Studio

Peak Levels for Vocals

Basil · 7 · 10690
 

Offline Basil

  • Hero Member
  • *****
    • Posts: 913
    • http://www.bandmix.com/mike-basil/
I realize you don't want any level to go past 0 when recording however I don't know what the preferrded method is.

When recording vocals do you want a wave form that goes almost up to the top (Hot Signal) of the graph without getting clipped or is it ok to have it set at a much lower ( Mild Signal) level just incase you need the extra room for some peaks?
How low of a level is acceptable?



Offline NickT

  • NickT
  • Administrator
  • Super Hero
  • *****
    • Posts: 5896
  • Here I am!
    • Ain't TV
Basil,

In general - If you are recording 24bit, -6 is plenty. That takes into consideration the your source is good (low signal to noise ratio)

At 16 bit, as hot as you can get it without clipping. I'd aim closer to -3.

Nick
NickT

"...My life just Ain't TV..."

www.AintTV.com

www.TestafiedRecords.com


Offline Basil

  • Hero Member
  • *****
    • Posts: 913
    • http://www.bandmix.com/mike-basil/

Offline CosmicDolphin

  • Jedi
  • *******
    • Posts: 10609
  • Do or do not..there is no try
    • Phonicworks : TV Production Music
One thing that's always a bug bear of mne when mixing other peoples tracks is how low a level some of them record stuff at, and I have to really boost it up which can bring up the noise floor.

I'm talking tracks recorded at -15 to -20 db's PEAK    :o   

Check your gain structures guys it can make a huge difference in sound quality  :)

ok.... I'll get off my soapbox now  >:D
We never finish a mix... we simply abandon them.
You can't polish a turd, but you can always spray paint it GOLD
Great songs are not written, they are re-witten


Offline Basil

  • Hero Member
  • *****
    • Posts: 913
    • http://www.bandmix.com/mike-basil/
Hi CD,

That's interesting.
I've been recording with a high level and it always seems that I peak out.
That's why I was wondering about recording at lower levels.

Question....if you record at lower levels can you take the track and render it as a seperate wave file and than boost the levels back to where they should be ?

« Last Edit: September 07, 2008, 03:40:56 PM by Basil »


Offline CosmicDolphin

  • Jedi
  • *******
    • Posts: 10609
  • Do or do not..there is no try
    • Phonicworks : TV Production Music
Hi CD,

That's interesting.
I've been recording with a high of a level and it always seems that I peak out.
That's why I was wondering about recording at lower levels.

Question....if you record at lower levels can you take the track and render it as a seperate wave file and than boost the levels back to where they should be ?



You can but ou're just rasing the noise floor too, sothe signal to noise ratio will be worse than if you recorded it loud enough to begin with.

 I guess if it's a pop or rock mix and the track is never exposed you wouldn't notice, but you would on a more acoustic track.

Alot of pre-amps include a limiter to stop this..I think most DAWs have soft-clipping now too, but it's a bad habit to run it into the read all the while too.

CD

We never finish a mix... we simply abandon them.
You can't polish a turd, but you can always spray paint it GOLD
Great songs are not written, they are re-witten


Offline Tacman7

  • Hero Member
  • *****
    • Posts: 511
It was a big change for me when I started using hardware compression on tracking. I need a little help to create a track without too much change in dynamics.


 

Powered by EzPortal